Lingerie subsidy?

Posted in Uncategorized on Oct 5th, 2006, 10:07 am by yenjai

How to save a marriage?

A Melbourne fashion retailer has come up with a suggestion for lowering Australian divorce rates: lingerie subsidies.

lingerie

Ms Lee has called on the Federal Government to subsidise half the cost of sexy undergarments as a way to spice up a flagging marriage and dissuade wayward partners from straying.

“I honestly believe that a little bit of fashion glamour in the bedroom at home - or in the kitchen - can only help promote bonding and attractiveness and attention between partners,” she said.

“But good lingerie is very expensive. You used to be able to buy a pair of knickers for $1 but now $20 will get you very little. Individual items can cost $50 to $100,” Ms Lee said.

Ms Lee denied her plan was a publicity stunt, saying her company did not sell lingerie. She also downplayed the potential for mistresses to benefit from tax breaks.

What do you think?

source1 source2

9 Responses

  1. Eve
    October 5th, 2006 | 1:48 pm

    i wan to know…does it make a difference to a male..watever lingeire the wife is wearing?…IF wife mia body is like a cow?…wat i think is..if ur body is fat n ugly..no mattter wat u wear..u wont look sexy….wait wait..i go ask hubby first..if he say anything abt me being fat or to tat effect…he better watch out…

  2. October 5th, 2006 | 3:03 pm

    Dear Eve,
    You already strangled the answer before it come out from his mouth.
    So what do you expect?

  3. October 5th, 2006 | 9:32 pm

    Heheheee … body looks like a cow!! :P Creative descriptions you go there Eve.

    Any direct link between divorce rates and lingerie? Hrmmm ….

  4. October 5th, 2006 | 9:33 pm

    Heheheee … body looks like a cow!! :P Creative descriptions you got there Eve.

    Any direct link between divorce rates and lingerie? Hrmmm ….

  5. Eve
    October 6th, 2006 | 9:50 am

    hoiling : hehe….i dun think there is any link bet divorce rate and lingerie la…if the body is sexy…u pakai normal underwear oso , it is still sexy….finally it is wat is underneath tat counts…wat say u landlord?…

  6. October 6th, 2006 | 11:24 am

    Lingerie? I have no knowledge. (innocent face)

  7. October 6th, 2006 | 3:24 pm

    eve and hoiling, cow oso can be sexy wat? beauty lies in the eyes of the beholder.

  8. Eve
    October 7th, 2006 | 10:13 am

    bernard : errr….i m very disappointed in u la…habih respek oredi…cow wor…cow leh….u sure ar?..

  9. October 7th, 2006 | 1:44 pm

    I think having lingerie or not, it just another tools to spice life up. Therefore, I guess the function of it to enhance the quality married life. If the hubby or wifey wanna to stray .. who can stopped them? :P

Leave a reply